Russia has the right to place nuclear arms on its soil, including Crimea


The Unelected, US Appointed, all around CIA Puppet Minister of Foreign Affairs for the Coup imposed Ukraine Junta, Pavlo Klimkin

The pointless and contrived US-NATO confrontation with Russia is much more serious than the irritating incidents in which US intelligence airplanes trail their coats near sensitive installations of foreign nations. It involves a few incompetent politicians (who are strikingly unpopular in their own countries) making threats against a proud nation that has had almost enough of their arrogance. Provoking Russia may be intended to play well with their domestic audiences, but there is a limit to Russian patience, and to that of the Chinese, too, who are equally proud of their place in the world, and justifiably so. There might well be blowback. And if that comes we’re all going to suffer. -
Brian Coughley


Russia has the right to house nuclear weapons on its territory, if it deems this move to be necessary, while this also includes the option of stationing them in Crimea, a statement from the Foreign Ministry read.
“Russia obviously retains the right, if needed, to deploy its nuclear weapons anywhere on its national territory, including on the Crimean Peninsula,” the Director of the Department for Non-Proliferation and Arms control at the Russian Foreign Ministry, Mikhail Ulyanov told the RIA Novosti news agency on Monday.
Ulyanov’s statement comes in response to the Ukrainian Foreign Minister Pavlo Klimkin saying in May that the deployment of Russian arms in Crimea would violate the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
“Any activity or even signals from Russia that they are even considering deploying nuclear weapons in Crimea will be considered a grave breach of the international code of conduct. If this happens, the international community will need to act decisively,” Klimkin said.

 
Russia to boost military presence in Crimea, response to NATO E. Europe expansion

Mikhail Ulyanov added that the US missile defense plans remain a major challenge in relations between Moscow and Washington, while also mentioning that discussions between the two countries concerning nuclear disarmament are not looking positive.
“Of all the factors which are negatively affecting strategic stability, the most significant is the creation of the [US] National Missile Defense program,” he said, adding that the system was being developed step by step.
“Our position on this matter [US missile defense] has been voiced repeatedly. We need reliable guarantees of what we are told verbally at every corner – that this system is not directed against Russia’s nuclear deterrent. But so far we are told that such guarantees can not be written down on paper and that the system will be created with or without Russia’s backing,” Ulyanov added.

"Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly, and applying the wrong remedies." —Groucho Marx



2 comments:

  1. The USA has something like 800 or more overseas bases, while Russia has less than 10.

    And compare what the USA spends on the military each year versus what Russia does and the story is told... or not, since these two items are rarely seen in the MSM.

    We have nukes in Germany and Turkey and probably smaller ones on ships deployed into the Black Sea, yet the MSM conjures up meaningless confrontations to scare or maybe herd the sheeple into compliance.

    Probably even have some nukes deployed into space, which is a violation of a major treaty, but since the USA is 'exceptional,' we don't need no stinking treaties.

    A lot of this nonsense partially is because of that SLC, which needs the USD to stay dominant so they can continue to ransack Palestine and live way beyond their means.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Something wicked this way comes.

    ReplyDelete

If you sit by a river long enough, you'll see the body of your enemy float by.
Old Japanese proverb